Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 43 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 16 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 405 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |