Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 303 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 84 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 143 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.1 | |
| Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1705 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |