Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 233 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 - 420 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 11.2 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 10 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Freelander has 169 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`169 | ~ 2`134 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |