Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 57 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 12.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1934 litres | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has 161 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |