Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 246 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 84 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 324 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 12.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 161 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`949 kg | 2`850 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |