Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 27 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 2.07 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 75 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 44 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 965 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2010 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`105 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |