Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 136 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.4 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 420 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |