Honda CR-V 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V 2012 and Honda CR-V 2010 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Honda CR-V 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V 2012 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2012 is 5 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V 2012 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1669 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Honda CR-V 2010 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V 2012 (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`200 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`653 kg | 1`713 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 547 kg | 447 kg | |
| Honda CR-V 2012 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Honda CR-V 2010. Therefore, Honda CR-V 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |