Honda CR-V 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 4 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.3 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Toyota RAV4 2006: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually with a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger, but slightly lower. Honda CR-V is 12 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 30 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 515 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.6 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |