Honda CR-V 2007 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 26 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 20 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 556 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | 1520 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 565 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`215 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |