Honda CR-V 1997 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 128 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 255 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 17 seconds | |
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 16 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, but torque is 73 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
670 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
Honda CR-V is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 850 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 2100 litres | |
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 475 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 1430 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.7 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`380 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |