Honda CR-V 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 16 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 150 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 497 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1455 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Honda CR-V has more luggage space (by 2 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 345 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |