Honda CR-V 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Honda CR-V 2013) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda CR-V 2010) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V 2013 engine produces 30 HP less power than Honda CR-V 2010, but torque is 108 NM more than Honda CR-V 2010. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V 2013 consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V 2013 consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2010 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2013 is 5 cm longer than the Honda CR-V 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V 2013 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V 2013 has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V 2013 has 65 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |