Honda CR-V 2004 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 4 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.8 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 34 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 125 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 957 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Toyota RAV4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |