Honda CR-V 2002 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 4 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.8 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 34 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 125 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 957 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |