Honda CR-V 2007 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Honda CR-V is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Qashqai can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Qashqai also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 166 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 192 - 340 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | 10 - 12.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 18 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | 1520 litres | |
Honda CR-V has 146 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 565 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`105 | ~ 2`170 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 5200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |