Honda Accord 2011 vs BMW 3 series 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 192 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Honda Accord engine produces 13 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 2 NM more than BMW 3 series. Despite the higher power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Accord consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Accord engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Honda CR-V | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Honda Accord 2011 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda Accord 2011 2.0 engine BMW 3 sērija 2008 2.0 engine: The BMW N43 engine is built around a lightweight alloy cylinder block with a twin-cam, 16-valve head. It uses a dual-pump fuel delivery system—one located inside the tank to transfer fuel and supply the high-pressure pump, which then boosts fuel pressure up to 200 bar. Notably, the system lacks a fine fuel filter and relies only on a ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 20 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 460 litres | |
Honda Accord has 7 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`935 | 1`880 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6400 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |