Honda Accord 2011 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 193 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is more dynamic to drive. Honda Accord engine produces 1 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda CR-V | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda Accord 2011 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda Accord 2011 2.0 engine Mazda 6 2010 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
| Honda Accord is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1183 litres | 1751 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Honda Accord has 113 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 568 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |