Honda Accord 2001 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 84 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 12.1 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 9.5 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
| Honda Accord is 18 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Accord is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1229 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |