Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Volvo 960 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 281 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is more dynamic to drive. Ford Scorpio engine produces 3 HP more power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Volvo 960. Thanks to more power Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 11.1 | |
|
The Volvo 960 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 960 has
| |