Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Opel Omega 1999

 
Ford Scorpio
1997 - 1998
Opel Omega
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.9 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 207 HP211 HP
Torque: 281 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds10 seconds
Ford Scorpio is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Scorpio engine produces 4 HP less power than Opel Omega, but torque is 11 NM more than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.811.3
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Scorpio consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 540 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway880 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.90 m
Width: 1.87 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.50 m
Ford Scorpio is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1800 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`280
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Ford Scorpio has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Scorpio, so Ford Scorpio quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons: Ford Scorpio has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv