Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Volvo 960 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 55 HP less power than Volvo 960, but torque is 27 NM more than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.6 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |