Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Opel Omega 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 29 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.8 | |
| Ford Scorpio consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 2`205 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Scorpio, so Ford Scorpio quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Opel Omega has
| |