Ford Scorpio 1997 vs SAAB 9-5 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 9-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 207 HP | 150 - 230 HP | |
Torque: | 167 - 281 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.4 seconds | 7.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 12.8 | 9.3 - 11.4 | |
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
Ford Scorpio is larger, but lower. Ford Scorpio is 2 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.4 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`726 | ~ 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |