Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 207 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 281 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.4 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 12.8 | 6.3 - 9.1 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger, but lower. Ford Scorpio is 15 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1677 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 626, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`726 | ~ 1`866 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |