Ford Mondeo 2005 vs Peugeot 407 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 407 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 46 HP less power than Peugeot 407, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Peugeot 407. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 407 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 407 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 407 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 407, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mondeo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1365 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 133 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 407. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 335 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Peugeot 407, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`183 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 407 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Peugeot 407 has
| |