Ford Mondeo 2007 vs Peugeot 407 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 4 HP more power than Peugeot 407, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Galaxy, Ford C-Max, Ford S-Max | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 407 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 engine Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 407 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 7 cm longer than the Peugeot 407, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 554 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1745 litres | 1365 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 147 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 407. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 407, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`183 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 407 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Peugeot 407 has
| |