Ford Mondeo 2005 vs Skoda Octavia 2004

 
Ford Mondeo
2005 - 2007
Skoda Octavia
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP140 HP
Torque: 245 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds9.6 seconds
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 50 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1190 km on highway
860 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.57 m
Width: 1.81 m1.77 m
Height: 1.43 m1.46 m
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Mondeo is 16 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres560 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litres1350 litres
Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 60 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 20 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9801`995
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 16001800
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Skoda Octavia has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv