Ford Focus 2005 vs Volvo S40 2004

 
Ford Focus
2005 - 2008
Volvo S40
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 109 HP136 HP
Torque: 240 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Focus engine produces 27 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.6
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Ford Focus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway1220 km on highway
920 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.47 m
Width: 1.84 m1.77 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Ford Focus is larger.
Ford Focus is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 526 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
931 litres883 litres
Ford Focus has more luggage capacity.
Ford Focus has 122 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 48 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Ford Focus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8201`940
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volvo S40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12002200
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.6/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Focus has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv