Ford Focus 2005 vs Volvo S40 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 5 HP more power than Volvo S40, but torque is 85 NM less than Volvo S40. Thanks to more power Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo V50, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S40 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo S40 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Ford Focus is larger. Ford Focus is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
931 litres | 883 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage capacity. Ford Focus has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Ford Focus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo S40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |