Ford Focus 2014 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Megane, but torque is 20 NM more than Renault Megane. Despite less power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Focus consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
| Ford Focus is 7 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1502 litres | 1504 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Ford Focus has 31 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Ford Focus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`900 kg | 1`932 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`537 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 363 kg | 612 kg | |
| Ford Focus load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 69 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Focus, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Renault Megane has
| |