Ford Fiesta 2003 vs Ford Fiesta 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 106 - 204 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 15.8 seconds | 10.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.5 | 4.3 - 7.5 | |
Ford Fiesta 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta 2002. On average, a Ford Fiesta 2003 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Fiesta 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Fiesta 2003 and Ford Fiesta 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 284 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
945 litres | 947 litres | |
Ford Fiesta 2003 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta 2002. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta 2002 (by 2 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`538 | ~ 1`540 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |