Ford Fiesta 1999 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 103 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 145 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 17.5 seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.3 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
On average, the Ford Fiesta petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Renault Clio. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Fiesta is 6 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Ford Fiesta has 5 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`476 | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Renault Clio has
| |