Ford Fiesta 2002 vs Renault Clio 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 204 NM | 93 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 15.8 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.5 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Ford Fiesta petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Ford Fiesta equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Fiesta is larger. Ford Fiesta is 11 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 284 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | 1037 litres | |
| Ford Fiesta has 29 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`540 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 5.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
| |