Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler PT Cruiser and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, but Chrysler PT Cruiser torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 538 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 265 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |