Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Volkswagen Touran 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 3 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, but torque is 26 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine Volkswagen Touran 2005 2.0 engine: 2.0 FSI engine, part of the EA827 family, features a lightweight aluminum block with cast-iron liners and a unique timing system. A toothed belt drives the exhaust camshaft, while the intake camshaft is driven by a single-row chain, which also integrates with the variable valve timing mechanism. The timing regulator is ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 70 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 225 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2141 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |