Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Volvo XC70 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 13 HP more power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Volvo XC70. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler 300C consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler 300C is 18 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Chrysler 300C can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |