Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C 2005 and Chrysler 300C 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Chrysler 300C 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
| By specification Chrysler 300C 2005 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C 2005 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chrysler 300C 2005 and Chrysler 300C 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1602 litres | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C 2005 has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C 2005 has 126 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C 2005. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler 300C 2005 (by 1098 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`360 kg | 2`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`875 kg | 1`840 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 520 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |