Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Audi A6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300C is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300C engine produces 28 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler 300C consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 9 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 65 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Audi A6 has
| |