Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Audi A6 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 7 HP less power than Audi A6, but torque is 60 NM more than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler 300C consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300C over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Audi A6 2005: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | Used also on Volkswagen Phaeton | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 300C might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine Audi A6 2005 3.0 engine: The car engine may require significant maintenance and part replacements as mileage increases. Between 200,000 and 300,000 km, the costly timing chain might need replacement, while the drive belt has a shorter ... More about Audi A6 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 9 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 65 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Audi A6 has
| |