Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Mercedes E class 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 13 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler 300C consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 13 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes E class (by 348 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Chrysler 300C can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |