Chrysler 300C 2015 vs Lexus ES 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 HP | 302 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 362 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 6 HP less power than Lexus ES, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Lexus ES. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.4 | |
|
The Lexus ES is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus ES, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Lexus ES) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 4.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 7 cm longer than the Lexus ES, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 394 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 68 litres more trunk space than the Lexus ES. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`150 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 39 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Lexus ES has
| |