Audi A6 2008 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A6 engine produces 22 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, but torque is 10 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Thanks to more power Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A6 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A5, Audi Q5 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Audi A6 is smaller. Audi A6 is 9 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 630 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1602 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Audi A6 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`475 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |