Audi A6 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A6 engine produces 7 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, but torque is 60 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Thanks to more power Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi A6 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Audi A6 has 4x4: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Phaeton | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 300C might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi A6 2005 3.0 engine: The car engine may require significant maintenance and part replacements as mileage increases. Between 200,000 and 300,000 km, the costly timing chain might need replacement, while the drive belt has a shorter ... More about Audi A6 2005 3.0 engine Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Audi A6 is smaller. Audi A6 is 9 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 630 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1602 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Audi A6 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`455 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |