Audi A3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2018

 
Audi A3
2013 - 2016
Mazda 3
2018 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 143 HP155 HP
Torque: 320 NM203 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 secondsn/a seconds
Audi A3 engine produces 12 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 117 NM more than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.57.6
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A3 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway790 km on highway
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Mazda 3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda 3 2018 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres351 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
880 litresno data
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 74 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`870no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Audi A3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 3, so Audi A3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12 40013 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv