Audi A3 2004 vs Volvo S40 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 - 3.2 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 - 250 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 148 - 350 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 13.2 seconds | 6.8 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 10.6 | 4.9 - 10.0 | |
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Audi A3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Audi A3 is smaller. Audi A3 is 18 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 404 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1120 litres | 883 litres | |
Audi A3 has 34 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 237 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`944 | ~ 1`928 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |