Audi 80 1988 vs Volvo S40 2006

 
Audi 80
1988 - 1991
Volvo S40
2006 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 113 HP145 HP
Torque: 170 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.37.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km8.4 l/100km
By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway960 km on highway
830 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Audi 80 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.40 m1.45 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 375 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data883 litres
Volvo S40 has more luggage space.
Audi 80 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`850
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv