Audi 80 1990 vs Volvo S40 2006

 
Audi 80
1990 - 1991
Volvo S40
2006 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP145 HP
Torque: 181 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds9.5 seconds
Audi 80 engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Volvo S40. Despite less power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.37.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 285 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
710 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.37 m1.45 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 373 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data883 litres
Volvo S40 has more luggage space.
Audi 80 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`850
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv