Audi 80 1990 vs Volvo S40 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 181 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Audi 80 engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Volvo S40. Despite less power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
710 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.45 m | |
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 373 litres | 404 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |