Audi 80 1989 vs Volvo S40 2006

 
Audi 80
1989 - 1991
Volvo S40
2006 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 113 HP145 HP
Torque: 170 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.37.4
Audi 80 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway960 km on highway
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.40 m1.45 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data883 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 81 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5401`850
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv