Audi 80 1986 vs Volvo S40 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 165 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi 80 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Audi 80 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |